The Relationship Between Knowledge of Major Affirmation and Vocabulary Mastery with The Ability to Write Exposition Texts in Junior High School Students

Authors

  • I Nengah Suhartana STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung
  • Wayan Satria Jaya STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung
  • Akhmad Sutiyono STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Keywords:

junior high school, vocabulary mastery, writing ability

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between knowledge of affirmation and vocabulary mastery with the skills of writing expository texts in class VIII students of SMPN 2 Bandar Mataram  To achieve the research objectives above, the data was collected after all the events in question took place. The techniques used in collecting research data are questionnaires, tests, and observations. Research data analysis techniques include analysis requirements test, normality test, and research hypothesis testing techniques. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that, (1) there is a negative relationship between knowledge of assertiveness and skills in writing expository texts, indicated by a regression coefficient of 0.914. (2) there is a positive and significant relationship between vocabulary mastery and expository text writing skills as indicated by the regression coefficient of 0.860. (3) there is a positive and significant relationship between vocabulary mastery and the skill of writing exposition texts as indicated by the regression coefficient of 0.525 but has no effect on the variable knowledge of figurative language assertion. Based on the table, it can also be seen that the regression coefficient of the mastery of affirmation variable (X1) is -0.042, which means that if the mastery of affirmation increases 1 value, the result of writing students' exposition text (Y) will decrease by 0.042. The coefficient is negative, meaning that there is a negative relationship between the students' mastery of affirmation knowledge and the skills of writing expository texts.

References

Belsey, C. (2003). Critical practice. Routledge.

Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge University Press.

Gómez Burgos, E. (2017). Use of the genre-based approach to teach expository essays to English pedagogy students. How, 24(2), 141-159.

Hastomo, T. (2016, January). The Effectiveness of Edmodo to teach writing viewed from students’ motivation. In Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Lycan, W. G. (2018). Philosophy of language: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.

Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading research quarterly, 47(1), 91-108.

Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The importance of four skills reading, speaking, writing, listening in a lesson hour. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1(1), 29-31.

Stracke, E. (2016). Language learning strategies of Indonesian primary school students: In relation to self-efficacy beliefs. System, 60, 1-10.

Susanto, A. (2017). The teaching of vocabulary: A perspective. Jurnal Kata: Penelitian Tentang Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(2), 182-191.

Warschauer, M. (2013). 9. Language, Identity, and the Internet. In Race in cyberspace (pp. 151-170). Routledge.

Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-14

How to Cite

Suhartana, I. N. ., Jaya, W. S., & Sutiyono, A. . (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge of Major Affirmation and Vocabulary Mastery with The Ability to Write Exposition Texts in Junior High School Students. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 1(1), 30–39. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stkippgribl.ac.id/index.php/ijlhe/article/view/1000