Cracking the Code: A Pronunciation Error Analysis of Tenth-Grade Students at SMK SMTI Bandar Lampung

Authors

  • Idham Kholid UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Irawansyah UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Putri Lestari UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52217/ijlhe.v7i2.1648

Keywords:

communication strategy, error analysis, pronunciation, students

Abstract

This study analyzed pronunciation errors made by tenth-grade students at SMK SMTI Bandar Lampung during the first semester of the 2023/2024 academic year. The objectives of the research were to identify the pronunciation errors, particularly in monophthong sounds, and to determine the causes of these errors. The study employed a qualitative research methodology. The participants were tenth-grade students of SMK SMTI Bandar Lampung, with a sample of 30 students from the KI 2 class, selected using purposive sampling. Data collection involved students being given 36 words containing short and long monophthong vowel sounds (/ɑ:/, /ɪ:/, /u:/, /ɜ:/, /ɔ:/, /ɒ/, /ɪ/, /ʊ/, /e/, /æ/, /ʌ/, /ə/). The pronunciation errors were analyzed using the Linguistic Category Taxonomy, as proposed by Dulay. Additionally, observations were conducted to identify the causes of errors based on Brown’s theoretical framework. The findings revealed that students made a total of 923 pronunciation errors in monophthong sounds, comprising 473 errors in short vowels and 450 errors in long vowels. Common errors included replacing correct sounds with incorrect ones, adding unnecessary sounds, and omitting required sounds. Regarding the causes of errors, interlingual transfer was identified as the most frequent cause. Other contributing factors included intralingual transfer, the context of learning, and communication strategies

References

Bailey, K. M. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking. McGraw-Hill.

Bernard, H. R., Wutich, A., & Ryan, G. W. (2016). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage Publications.

Brown, H. D. (2006). Principles of language learning and Teaching (5th Edition). In Pearson Education ESL.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. Oxford University Press.

Hasbi, M., & Nursaputri, E. (2024). Using ELSA Speak Application as A Medium to Improve English Speaking Skills. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education , 7(2), 91–102.

Istiara, F., & Hastomo, T. (2023). Exploring lecturers and administrative staffs’ strategies to hone EFL students’ digital literacy. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.33369/JOALL.V8I1.25568

Istiara, F., Hastomo, T., & Indriyanta, W. A. (2023). A study of students’ engagement and students’ speaking skill: A correlational research. TEKNOSASTIK, 21(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.33365/TS.V21I1.2198

Sari, L. P., Hastomo, T., & Nurchurifiani, E. (2023). Assessing the Efficacy of Duolingo for Acquiring English Vocabulary Skills: Experimental Research. Journal of English Teaching Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL), 6(2), 193–200.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. England. Pearson Education Limited.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-21

How to Cite

Kholid, I., Irawansyah, & Lestari, P. (2024). Cracking the Code: A Pronunciation Error Analysis of Tenth-Grade Students at SMK SMTI Bandar Lampung. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 7(2), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.52217/ijlhe.v7i2.1648