The Use of A Scientific Approach to Improve Argumentation Writing Ability for Middle School Students

Authors

  • Lucia Sri Wahyuningsih STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung
  • Akhmad Sutiyono STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung
  • Tommy Hastomo STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Keywords:

argumentation, scientific approach, writing ability

Abstract

This study aimed to determine and describe the improvement of argumentation writing skills through a scientific approach to class VIII students of SMP Negeri 18 Bandar Lampung in the 2018/2019 academic year. The method in this study used a classroom action research design carried out in three cycles. This research was conducted in three cycles. The teacher prepares the lesson plan for each cycle. Each action consists of four stages: planning, action, observation, and reflection. The reflection results are used as the basis for developing a further action plan. Therefore, this research can be called collaborative classroom action research. The results showed that the scientific approach could improve the argumentation writing skills of SMP Negeri 18 Bandar Lampung students. Based on the research results in the first cycle, 49% for classical achievement and 28% for the number of students who got the minimum standard score increased in Cycle II, which reached 63% for classical achievement and 69% for students who finished studying. While Cycle III, which is the implementation of the final action, the results show the learning objectives in general and the research objectives in particular, namely reaching 75% for classical achievement and 85% for students' high argumentative writing skills. The scientific approach used in the learning process can improve the ability to write arguments.

References

Ferretti, R. P., Lewis, W. E., & Andrews-Weckerly, S. (2009). Do goals affect the structure of students' argumentative writing strategies?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 577.

Hastomo, T. (2016, January). The Effectiveness of Edmodo to teach writing is viewed from students' motivation. In Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Hendripides, S., & Hikmah, N. (2018). Development of innovative teaching materials through scientific approach. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 14-22.

Indrilla, N. (2018). The effectiveness of scientific approach and contextual teaching and learning approach in teaching writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 405-413.

Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217-236.

Lestari, S. ., Surastina, S., Rachmasisca, F. M. ., & Hastomo, T. . (2018). The Correlation of Effective Sentence Mastery and Language Attitude with Students’ Writing Summary Ability. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 1(2), 1–10.

Mahowald, K., Dautriche, I., Gibson, E., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2018). Word forms are structured for efficient use. Cognitive science, 42(8), 3116-3134.

Mehrabian, A. (2017). Communication without words. In Communication theory (pp. 193-200). Routledge.

Sardi, A., Haryanto, A., & Weda, S. (2017). The Distinct types of diction used by the efl teachers in the classroom interaction. International Journal Of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(3), 1061-1066.

Theodora, B. D., & Marti'ah, S. (2017). The Difference of KTSP and Kurikulum 2013 Implementation, Family Environment Toward Career Choosing Readiness. Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(2), 159-169.

Wiriatmadja, Rochiati, 2007. Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Downloads

Published

2019-06-14

How to Cite

Wahyuningsih, L. S. ., Sutiyono, A. ., & Hastomo, T. . (2019). The Use of A Scientific Approach to Improve Argumentation Writing Ability for Middle School Students. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 2(1), 63–71. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stkippgribl.ac.id/index.php/ijlhe/article/view/836