The Use of Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw in Enhancing Students’ Reading Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52217/ksatra.v6i2.1578Keywords:
Cooperative Learning, Jigsaw, ReadingAbstract
Generally, most of students have some problems in learning English, especially in learning reading. The problem in this research was the students don’t know yet kind of technique, strategies, method of learning reading. And also students have lack of vocabulary and grammar. And then the students got difficulties in comprehend the English text. The English teacher should have good method in teaching and learning English. The object of this research was to know the significant influence of Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw towards students’ reading ability at the tenth grade of SMK Taman Siswa, Bandar Lampung in 2024/2025. Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw improved students’ reading ability. The sample in this research were two classes, they were experimental class and control class. In the experimental class the writer used Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw in teaching reading and the control class the writer used direct instruction. In the data collecting technique the writer used reading test, and used multiple choice. In the data analysis the writer used t-test formula.
References
Alison, M., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. New Jersey London: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, publishers.
David, N. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. United States: McGraw-Hill Education.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational Research An Introduction (7th Edition). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gebhard, J. (2000). Teaching English as a Foreign Language or Second Language. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Glasgow, N., & Hicks, C. (2003). What Successful Teachers Do. 91 Research-Based Classroom Strategies for New and Veteran Teachers. Corwin Press, Inc.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. England: Pearson Education.
Grellet, P. (2004). Developing Reading Skills. United State of America: Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. England: Pearson Education.
Kagan, D. . (1992). Implications of Research on Teacher Belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.
Lauren, S., & Barbara, H. (2009). Elements in the Teaching of Reading. Soloman: Zayed University.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in Education: A Conceeptual Introduction. New York: Longman.
Mubarok, H., & Sofiana, N. (2017). Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Reading Motivation: Examining The Effect on Students’ Reading Ability. Lingua Cultura, 1(1), 1–9.
Patel, M. ., & Jain, P. M. (2008). English Language Teaching: Methods, Tools & Techniques. Jaipur: Sunrise Publishers and Distributors.
Ruhelhart, D. . (1985). Toward an Interactive Model of Reading. In H. Singer &R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Process of Reading. New York: International Reading Association.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Thomas, M. M., & Manzo, A. V. (2001). Proficient reader characteristics: Relationships among text-dependent and higher-order literacy variables with reference to stage theories of intellectual development. University of Missouri--Kansas City.
Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practic, 2(1), 1–17.
Wallace, C. (2010). Language Teaching a Scheme for Teacher Education. New York: Oxford University Press.
