Asesmen Kompetensi Pedagogik Calon Guru: Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Program Studi PGSD

Authors

  • Eko Kuntarto Universitas Jambi
  • Maryono Maryono Universitas Jambi

Keywords:

assessment, pedagogical competence, students, prospective teachers

Abstract

This study aims to assess the pedagogical competence of student teacher candidates. This research is a case study. The research object is pedagogic competence. The research subjects were 200 PGSD students at Jambi University who were selected randomly. The research instrument used the Teacher Competency Assessment application. All data is retrieved online. Data analysis was performed by classification based on ideal mean score and ideal standard deviation, and non-parametric analysis using Kruskal-Wallis difference test and Spearman correlation test. The results showed (1) the mastery of the characteristics of the third semester students was 68.33, the fifth semester was 80.83m and the seventh semester was 82.50; (2) Mastery of learning theory and teaching learning principles in the three groups of students, respectively 71.50, 81.25, and 82.50; (3) ability to develop curriculum, respectively 63.50, 82.50, and 81.25; (4) The ability to carry out educational learning activities, respectively 55.90, 84.54, and 83.72; (5) there is a significant relationship between student teacher candidates pursued and pedagogical competence.

References

Anderson, L W. (2010). Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Australia Education Ministers. (2011). MOE Work Plan Seminar 2011.

Barrat, C., (2014). “Higher Order Thinking And Assessment”. International Seminar on current issues in Primary Education. Prodi PGSD Universitas Muhammadiyah Makasar.

Burnett. Nicholas. (2008). “The Delors Report: A Guide towards Education for All”. European Journal of Education. Vol. 43, No. 2, Learning to Live Together: A Necessary Utopia (Jun., 2008), pp. 181-187.

Chouhan's, V.Sh & Srivastava, S. (2014). Understanding Competencies and Competency Modeling―A Literature Survey DOI: 10.9790/487X-16111422

Fathivajargah, K. (2003). Standard School. 7th Edition. Fakher, Tehran.

Harian Pikiran Rakyat, 17 Oktober 2019, dari https://www.pikiran- rakyat.com/pendidikan/pr-01321343/jumlah-dan-mutu-lptk-harus- dievaluasi, diunduh 2 Maret 2020.

http://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/gantang/index.

Ilanlou, Maryam & Zand, Maryam. (2011). “Professional Competencies of Teacher and the Qualitative Evaluation”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 29, 2011, Pages 1143-1150

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, (2007a). Permendiknas Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru.

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, (2007b). Permendiknas 18/2007 tentang Sertifikasi bagi Guru dalam Jabatan.

Korthagen, F.A.J. (2004). “In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-97.

Kouwenhoven, G. W. (2003). Designing for competence in Mozambique : towards a competence-based curriculum for the Faculty of Education of the Eduardo Mondlane University. Enschede: University of Twente.

Kuntarto, E., (2018). “Analisis Tingkat Pemahaman Guru Terhadap Konsep Pembelajaran Aritmatika-Bahasa di Sekolah Dasar”. Jurnal Gantang III (2) (2018): 97-108. p-ISSN: 2503-0671.

Kuntarto, E., Agus Trianto, Wahyu Wahyu Nurhayati, Heni Handayani, & Maryono, (2019). Model Penilaian Kompetensi Guru Indonesia. Laporan Hasil Penelitian Hibah Bersaing Puspendik Kemendikbud RI, TA 2019.

Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2016). Education Research: Competencies For Analysis And Applications. London, England: Pearson Education.

OECD (2010). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results: Executive Summary.

Payong, Marcelus R., (2011). Sertifikasi Profesi Guru: Konsep Dasar, Problematika dan Implementasinya. Jakarta: PT. Indeks

Plomp, Tjeerd & Nieveen, Nienke. (editors). 2013. “An Introduction to Educational Design Research”. Proceedings Of The Seminar Conducted At The East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26.

Reeves, T. C. & Mckenney, Susan. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research. DOI: 10.4324/9781315105642. Publisher: Routledge

Taylor, S. (2016) UK Professional Standards Framework (UKPSF) Dimensions of the Framework for Doctoral Supervisors. Higher Education Academy. Available on-line at https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/ukpsf_dof_doct oral_supervisors_150416_final_0.pdf Accessed 28th April 2016.

Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen

Published

2020-10-14

How to Cite

Kuntarto, E. ., & Maryono, M. (2020). Asesmen Kompetensi Pedagogik Calon Guru: Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Program Studi PGSD. Lentera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 13(2), 377–390. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stkippgribl.ac.id/index.php/lentera/article/view/476

Issue

Section

Articles