Interpretasi Tindak Tutur melalui Metakognisi pada Pidato Presiden: Kajian Kritis terhadap Pidato Kepala Negara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52217/ksatra.v7i1.1824Keywords:
tindak tutur; metakognisi; pidato presidenAbstract
This study aims to explore the influence of metacognition on the comprehension of speech acts within presidential speeches. Presidential speeches are a formal mode of communication that requires the audience to grasp both the explicit and implicit meanings of the messages conveyed. In this communication process, metacognition—which involves awareness, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive processes—plays a crucial role in helping the audience identify intentions, resolve ambiguities, and enhance comprehension effectiveness. This study employs qualitative content analysis to identify the metacognitive strategies applied by listeners and to assess their impact on interpreting speech acts in presidential speeches. The findings reveal that listeners with high metacognitive awareness are better equipped to accurately and reflectively understand messages, particularly when faced with indirect speech or implicit meanings. In addition to contributing theoretically by enriching the study of the relationship between metacognition and speech acts, this research also offers practical insights for public speakers to craft more effective, persuasive, and audience-responsive speeches. These findings are expected to enhance formal communication practices and foster stronger connections between leaders and society.
References
Abduljaleel, R., & Alattar, S. (2021). Arts Journal / No . 110 A Speech Act Analysis of American Presidential Speeches Asst . Prof . Rihab Abduljaleel Saeed Alattar ( Ph . D .). January 2014.
Carruthers, P., & Williams, D. M. (2022). Model-free metacognition. Cognition, 225(September 2021), 105117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105117
Eshbaugh-soha, M. (2017). The Politics of Presidential Speeches. February 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/07343460903390679
Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2010). The politics of presidential speeches. Congress and the Presidency, 37(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07343460903390679
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.34.10.906
Gai, F. H., & Wang, Y. (2022). Correlated metadiscourse and metacognition in writing research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(November), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026554
Ghasemi, F. (2020). Persuasive Language in Presidential Speeches. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 12, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.5750/bjll.v12i.1872
House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Altered speech act indication: A contrastive pragmatic study of English and Chinese Thank and Greet expressions. Lingua, 264, 103162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103162
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Izar, J., Nasution, M. M., Virginia, O., & Harianto, N. (2022). The Analysis of Locutionary, Illocutionary, and Perlocutionary of Speech Acts in the Short Story “Rembulan dalam Cappuccino” by Seno Gumira Ajidarma. JETLi: Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics, 3(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.55616/jetli.v3i1.265
J.L.Austin. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press.
Kissine, M. (2008). Locutionary, illocutionary, perlocutionary. Linguistics and Language Compass, 2(6), 1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00093.x
Moraru, V. (2021). Compartimentul. 3(3), 129–143.
Negi, S. K., Rajkumari, Y., & Rana, M. (2022). A deep dive into metacognition: Insightful tool for moral reasoning and emotional maturity. Neuroscience Informatics, 2(4), 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100096
Nejad, A. M. (2013). The Representation of a Presidential Speech : A Critical Discourse Analysis ISSN Print : 1836-8743 Chief Editors Dr . Paul Robertson. January.
Ortega, J., Montañes, P., Barnhart, A., & Kuhn, G. (2018). Exploiting failures in metacognition through magic: Visual awareness as a source of visual metacognition bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 65(April), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.008
Otto, A., & López-Medina, B. (2021). Promoting Metacognitive and Linguistic Skills: Digital Learning Logs in Pre-Service Teacher Training. Journal of Language and Education, 7(4), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.17323/JLE.2021.11680
Piazza, E. A., Hasenfratz, L., Hasson, U., & Lew-Williams, C. (2020). Infant and Adult Brains Are Coupled to the Dynamics of Natural Communication. Psychological Science, 31(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619878698
Pramitha, A. I. (2020). Formal Translation On Indonesian President Speech. Buletin Al-Turas, 21(2), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v21i2.3848
Retno Ningsih, T. W., Rahayu, R., & Purwaningsih, E. (2023). Speech Act in Talk Show: Locutionary, Illocutionary and Perlocutionary Acts in the Oprah Winfrey Show. Warta ISKI, 6(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.25008/wartaiski.v6i2.260
Saha, T., Saha, S., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2019). Tweet Act Classification : A Deep Learning based Classifier for Recognizing Speech Acts in Twitter. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2019-July(July), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851805
Sbisa, M. & K. T. (2013). Locution , illocution , perlocution . In : Pragmatics of Speech Actions. In Handbook of Pragmatics2 (Issue May).
Shava, G. N., Tlou, F. N., Hleza, S., Smarntha, S., & Mathonsi, E. (2021). Qualitative Content Analysis, Utility, Usability and Processes in Educational Research. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), V(VII), 554. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355186712
Sihombing, I. O. (2019). PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA INDONESIA BERBASIS BLENDED LEARNING DI ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0. Ijlecr - International Journal of Language Education and Culture Review, 5(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.052.00
Zdybel, D. (2021). Children’s conceptions of memory and imagination - from conceptual knowledge to metacognition. Phenomenographical study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(February), 100855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100855
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
Zulhamsyah, M. N., & Degaf, A. (n.d.). MICRO TEXTUAL ANALYSIS ON FIRST PRESIDENTIAL SPEECHES IN U . S . PRESIDENT ’ S INAUGURAL ADDRESS. 5(2), 75–96.
