The Language of Influence: Analyzing Lexical Density and Readability in Political Editorials Across Leading Newspapers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52217/ijlhe.v7i2.1599Keywords:
editorials, lexical density, newspaper, readabilityAbstract
This research examines lexical density and readability in election-related editorials from five major international newspapers: The Guardian, The Washington Post, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Oberlin Review, and The Los Angeles Times. Lexical density, the ratio of content words to total words, indicates linguistic complexity, while readability scores reflect accessibility. The Guardian exhibits the highest lexical density (60.02%), followed by The Washington Post (58.14%), reflecting a preference for precise, complex language. In contrast, The Sydney Morning Herald has the lowest density (54.74%), suggesting greater accessibility. Readability assessments categorize most editorials as “difficult” or “fairly difficult,” with The Guardian, The Sydney Morning Herald, and The Oberlin Review requiring advanced reading skills due to intricate vocabulary and lengthy sentences. These findings reveal distinct editorial objectives. Newspapers like The Guardian cater to an analytical readership seeking in-depth analysis, while outlets such as The Sydney Morning Herald prioritize readability, potentially appealing to a broader audience. The study underscores the importance of linguistic choices in shaping audience engagement, influencing accessibility, and impacting readers’ perceptions of political content. Varying complexity levels suggest that editorial strategies align with the ideological and demographic goals of each publication.
References
Amer, M. A. B. (2021). Lexical Density and Readability of Secondary Stage English Textbooks in Jordan. International Journal for Management and Modern Education, 2(2), 11–20. http://www.ijmme.com
Amer, M. A. B., & Baarah, H. A. (2021). Readability and Lexical Density of Reading Sections of Tenth Grade English Textbooks in Jordan and Sultanate of Oman: A Comparative Study. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE), September, 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i3.2438
Arshad, M., Yousaf, M. M., & Sarwar, S. M. (2023). Comprehensive Readability Assessment of Scientific Learning Resources. IEEE Access, 11(June), 53978–53994. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3279360
Choemue, S., & Bram, B. (2021). Lexical Richness in Scientific Journal Articles: A Comparison between ESL and EFL Writers. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.349
Clavel-Arroitia, B., & Pennock-Speck, B. (2021). Analysing lexical density, diversity, and sophistication in written and spoken telecollaborative exchanges. Call-Ej, 22(3), 230–250.
Fadhil, A., Gunawan, W., & Wirza, Y. (2023). Lexical Density in EFL Indonesian Textbooks: A Comparative Analysis. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 7(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v7i1.9727
Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J. (2009). Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Continuum International Publishing Group (Vol. 11, Issue 1).
Hastomo, T., & Aminatun, D. (2023). An Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers in Online News Media: Qualitative Research. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 95–103.
Kembaren, F. R., & Aswani, A. N. (2022). Exploring Lexical Density in the New York Times. ELLITE: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 7(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.32528/ellite.v7i2.8795
Maamuujav, U. (2021). Examining lexical features and academic vocabulary use in adolescent L2 students’ text-based analytical essays. Assessing Writing, 49(March), 100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100540
Maufiroh, Y. L., Hussen, B. T. E., & Femilia, P. S. (2024). Lexical Density of Reading Materials in An English Textbook: A Content Analysis. Journal of Language Intelligence and Culture, 6(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.35719/jlic.v6i2.104
Ngan, N. N. T., & Thao, N. T. T. (2016). Lexical Density and Readability of Non-English Majored Freshmen’s Writing in Vietnamese Context. 7th International Conference on TESOL: Innovations in …, November, 1–13.
Nkhobo, T., & Chaka, C. (2023). Syntactic pattern density, connectives, text easability, and text readability indices in students’ written essays: A Coh-Metrix analysis. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 121–136.
Oktarin, I. B., Saputri, M. E. E., Magdalena, B., Hastomo, T., & Maximilian, A. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT to enhance students’ writing skills, engagement, and feedback literacy. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 2306–2319. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1600
Putri, A. S., Anshary, E. P., Sinar, T. S., & Maharani, P. (2024). Analyzing Lexical Density and Readability in IELTS Band 4 Students’ Writing Test. International Journal Linguistics of Sumatra and Malay, 2(2), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.32734/ijlsm.v2i2.17886
Ramadhani, R., Aulawi, H., & Ulfa, R. L. (2023). Readability of Reading Texts as Authentic Materials Issued by ChatGPT: A Systemic Functional Perspective. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 8(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v8i2.1546
Rizkiani, D., Mahdi, S., & Sujatna, E. T. S. (2022). Lexical Density and Readability of the Facil’s ‘Advanced Learning Textbook’ for Indonesian High School Students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1157
Siregar, M. S., Hara, N. T., & Sinar, T. S. (2024). Lexical Density and Readability in Students’ Thesis Introductions. KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, Dan Sastra), 8(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.33479/klausa.v8i1.948
Sujatna, E. T. S., Emilia, E., & Kurniasih, N. (2023). Readability of PISA-like Reading Texts: A Lesson Learned from Indonesian Teachers. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p9
Waziana, W., Andewi, W., Hastomo, T., & Hasbi, M. (2024). Students’ perceptions about the impact of AI chatbots on their vocabulary and grammar in EFL writing. Register Journal, 17(2), 328–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v17i2.352-382
Yang, Y., Yap, N. T., & Mohamad Ali, A. (2023). Predicting EFL expository writing quality with measures of lexical richness. Assessing Writing, 57(May 2022), 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100762
Zhu, H., Wang, T., &, & Pang, N. (2024). Investigating Diachronic Changes in Lexical Density of Academic Texts: A Corpus-based Study. Available at SSRN 4774270, March, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4529173
Zulkornain, L. H., Mat, A. C., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2023). Does Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Improve Students’ Writing? Focus on Technical Aspects and Readability. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(10), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.10.1974.
