From Monologue to Dialogue: How Classroom Talk Shapes Communicative Learning in ELT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52217/c3zghf43Keywords:
Classroom discourse, Communicative competence, Dialogic teaching;, English language teaching, Monologic interactionAbstract
This study examines the role of classroom discourse in shaping communicative learning in Bangladeshi English Language Teaching (ELT) classrooms. Grounded in sociocultural and interactionist perspectives, the study adopts a mixed-methods design to explore both discourse patterns and participants’ perceptions. Data were collected from five secondary and tertiary classrooms involving approximately 150 students and 30 teachers through classroom observations, questionnaires, interviews, and pre- and post-task assessments. The findings reveal that classroom interaction remains predominantly monologic, with Teacher Talking Time significantly exceeding Student Talking Time. Despite this, both students and teachers demonstrate a strong preference for dialogic interaction. Quantitative results indicate that students feel more confident and engaged during pair and group activities, while qualitative data highlight persistent barriers such as fear of making mistakes, large class sizes, and exam-oriented instruction. Teachers acknowledge the importance of communicative competence but report challenges in implementing Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) due to contextual constraints, including limited time and institutional expectations. The study identifies a clear gap between communicative pedagogical ideals and classroom realities, resulting in a hybrid instructional environment where Grammar-Translation Method (GTM) practices coexist with CLT principles. These findings suggest that enhancing dialogic classroom talk is essential for fostering learners’ communicative competence. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting classroom discourse as a critical mechanism of learning rather than a peripheral feature of instruction. It also underscores the need for pedagogical and structural reforms to support sustainable dialogic practices in ELT contexts.
References
Al-Adeimi, S., & O’Connor, C. (2021). Exploring the relationship between dialogic teacher talk and students’ persuasive writing. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101388
Böheim, R., Schnitzler, K., Gröschner, A., Weil, M., Knogler, M., Schindler, A.-K., Alles, M., & Seidel, T. (2021). How changes in teachers’ dialogic discourse practice relate to changes in students’ activation, motivation and cognitive engagement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100450
Boyd, M. P. (2015). Relations Between Teacher Questioning and Student Talk in One Elementary ELL Classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3), 370–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16632451
Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2011). Dialogic teaching: talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25(6), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Chowdhury, R., & Kabir, A. H. (2014). Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Multilingual Education, 4(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13616-014-0021-2
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage .
García Mayo, M. del P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001
Hamid, M. O., & Honan, E. (2012). Communicative English in the primary classroom: implications for English-in-education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.678854
Hasan, Md. K., & Akhand, M. M. (2014). Reviewing the Challenges and Opportunities Presented by Code Switching and Mixing in Bangla. Journal of NELTA, 15(1), 77–88.
Islam, M. S., Hasan, M. K., Sultana, S., Karim, A., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). English language assessment in Bangladesh today: principles, practices, and problems. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00116-z
Kim, M.-Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003
Li, C., Dewaele, J.-M., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2025). Classroom environment and willingness to communicate in English: The mediating role of emotions experienced by university students in China. Language Teaching Research, 29(5), 2140–2160. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221111623
Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice. Language and Education, 22(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152499
Palma, G. (2014). A Classroom View of Negotiation of Meaning With EFL Adult Mexican Pupils. Sage Open, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014535941
Rahman, M. M., Islam, M. S., Karim, A., Chowdhury, T. A., Rahman, M. M., Seraj, P. M. I., & Singh, M. K. M. (2019). English language teaching in Bangladesh today: Issues, outcomes and implications. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0085-8
Rojas-Drummond, S., Torreblanca, O., Pedraza, H., Vélez, M., & Guzmán, K. (2013). ‘Dialogic scaffolding’: Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.12.003
Thoms, J. J. (2012). Classroom Discourse in Foreign Language Classrooms: A Review of the Literature. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01177.x
van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423340
van der Veen, C., Michaels, S., Dobber, M., van Kruistum, C., & van Oers, B. (2021). Design, implementation, and evaluation of dialogic classroom talk in early childhood education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 29, 100515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100515
van der Wilt, F., Bouwer, R., & van der Veen, C. (2022). Dialogic classroom talk in early childhood education: The effect on language skills and social competence. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101522
Wang, P., & Chen, G. (2026). The mediating role of willingness to communicate: Linking dialogic teaching to student discursive engagement in L2 classrooms. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261425022
Yang, Z., & Wang, S. (2022). Dialogic teaching in secondary classrooms in China: Features, commonalities, and distinctiveness. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 34, 100619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100619
Zabihi, R., Ghominejad, S., & Javad Ahmadian, M. (2024). Can willingness to communicate, communication in English anxiety, behavioural inhibition and behavioural action predict perceived L2 fluency? Language Teaching Research, 28(6), 2214–2233. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044071
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sadia Sultana, Ummay Habiba Usha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
