Metacognitive Strategies for Overcoming Paraphrasing Challenges in EFL Students’ Thesis Writing

Authors

  • Okta Indah Safitri UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Nur Syamsiah UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Hasanul Misbah UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52217/yqx9w970

Keywords:

Academic writing, EFL Students, Metacognitive Strategies, Paraphrasing Challenges

Abstract

Paraphrasing is a key ability in academic writing. It shows that students can understand, interpret, and reiterate information while still being honest in their work. In contrast, many students learning English as a foreign language still struggle with paraphrasing, which is often owing to weak language skills and the absence of appropriate learning methods. This study explores how English Education students at UIN Raden Intan Lampung use metacognitive methods, such as planning, monitoring, and evaluation, to overcome difficulties with paraphrase in their thesis writing. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were obtained using close-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with students in their last year of study. The thematic analysis shows that students who prepare carefully, check their understanding and how well they express themselves, and assess the quality and originality of their paraphrased work likely to create reformulations that are both cohesive and free from plagiarism. The findings indicate the necessity of developing metacognitive awareness to encourage learner independence and improve paraphrasing skills in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) academic writing.

References

Ader, M., Hassane, S., van Bruggen, J., & Vermeulen, M. (2023). Comparing metacognitive regulation and socially shared metacognitive regulation in face-to-face and online learning settings in ill-structured problem solving. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 39, 100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100684

Andewi, W., Waziana, W., Wibisono, D., Putra, K. A., Hastomo, T., & Oktarin, I. B. (2025). From prompting to proficiency: A mixed-methods analysis of prompting with ChatGPT versus lecturer interaction in an EFL classroom. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 20(2), 210–238. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/282318

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342

Dewi, N. R., Kannapiran, S., & Wibowo, W. A. (2018). Development of Digital Storytelling-Based Science Teaching Materials to Improve Students’ Metacognitive Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 16–24.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Namaziandost, E. (2025). Integrating flipped learning in AI-enhanced language learning: Mapping the effects on metacognitive awareness, writing development, and foreign language learning boredom. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100446

Slamet, J. (2024). Potential of ChatGPT as a digital language learning assistant: EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00143-2

Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognitive Awareness and EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Experiences in Utilising ChatGPT for Writing Feedback. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12811. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12811

Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. (2023). The effects of incorporating metacognitive strategies instruction into collaborative writing on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 1071–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1982675

Trinovita, D., Nurchurifiani, E., Hastomo, T., Andewi, W., & Hasbi, M. (2025). Exploring the Influence of Generative AI on Self-Regulated Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study in the EFL Context. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v10i2.6389

Waziana, W., Andewi, W., Wibisono, D., Hastomo, T., & Muslihudin, M. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT’s impact on critical, creative, and reflective thinking skills: A mixed-methods study in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Applied Research on English Language, 14, 77–114. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2025.145896.2564

Wu, J., Wang, J., Lei, S., Wu, F., & Gao, X. (2025). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding on deep learning in a GenAI-supported learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2479162

Yang, M., Wu, X., & Deris, F. D. (2025). Exploring EFL learners’ positive emotions, technostress and psychological well-being in AI-assisted language instruction with/without teacher support in Malaysia. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4184

Downloads

Published

2026-02-12

How to Cite

Safitri, O. I., Syamsiah, N., & Misbah, H. (2026). Metacognitive Strategies for Overcoming Paraphrasing Challenges in EFL Students’ Thesis Writing. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 9(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.52217/yqx9w970