Distribution of Cognitive Levels Analysis in Reading Exercises of English for Nusantara Textbook
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52217/5n7hkz16Keywords:
Cognitive process dimension, English for Nusantara, Reading exercises, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, Textbook analysisAbstract
Reading exercises in textbooks play an important role in shaping students’ cognitive experiences, particularly in English language learning. However, the levels of cognitive processes required by textbook reading exercises need to be systematically analyzed to identify the cognitive orientation being developed. This study aims to analyze the distribution of cognitive process levels in reading exercises in the English for Nusantara Grade VIII textbook based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy framework. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach using content analysis techniques. The data consisted of reading tasks found in the textbook, with a total of 140 tasks identified. Seventeen tasks were excluded because they did not meet the criteria of the Cognitive Process Dimension (CPD), resulting in 123 specific reading tasks being analyzed. Each task was classified into the six levels of cognitive processes in the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy through verbatim tabulation and theory-based judgment, which were verified through expert judgment by English teachers. The results indicate that the distribution of cognitive process levels is dominated by Remembering (43.09%) and Understanding (36.59%). Applying (2.44%), Analyzing (10.57%), and Evaluating (7.32%) appear in smaller proportions, while no reading tasks were found at the Creating level (0.00%). In conclusion, the reading exercises in the English for Nusantara Grade VIII textbook are oriented toward low- to mid-level cognitive processes, with limited opportunities for the development of higher-order thinking skills. Therefore, more cognitively balanced reading exercises are needed to optimize the role of reading activities in learning.
References
Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, & M. C. Wittrock, Eds.; Abridged Edition). Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arsana, A. A. P., Krisna, I. G. N., & Putra, K. K. T. (2025). Exploring cognitive domain of revised taxonomy bloom on my next words grade 1 English textbook. JOSELT (Journal on Studies in English Language Teaching), 6(1), 1–14.
Budiharso. (2014). Reading strategies in EFL classroom: A theoretical review. CENDEKIA: Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(2), 189. Doi: 10.30957/cendekia.v8i2.63
Ekalia, Y. J., Selamat, E. H., Jemadi, F., Jelimun, M. O., & Setiawan, A. A. (2022). Implementing Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy in Analyzing the Reading Comprehension Questions. Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i1.17823
Fitri, D., Rizal, S., & Andriadi. (2022). Reading Activities in English Textbook Based onRevised Bloom’s taxonomy Used in Curriculum2013. GHAITSA: IslamicEducationJourna, 3(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v3i3.712
Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). How Can Students Improve Their Reading Comprehension Skills? Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9201
Kasimi, Y. (2022). The extent of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book cover to cover 3 for reading comprehension and fluency. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 26(90), 497–508.
Kembaren, F. R. Br., Daulay, E., & Lidyani, F. (2018). Improving Students Reading Comprehension Achievement in Narrative Text Through Experience Text Relationship Method At VIII Grade MTs AlJam’iyatul Washliyah Tembung. . VISION: Journal of Language, Literature & Education, 14(14). http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/vis.v14i14.317
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Kuloğlu, A., & Tutuş, F. (2024). A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Based Analysis of Elementary School English Teaching Curriculum. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1083765
Li, F., & Wang, L. (2024). A study on textbook use and its effects on students’ academic performance. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00094-1
Muzairita. (2020). An analysis of Reading Materials in Textbook “When English Rings a Bell” for Junior High School. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.
Pertiwi, N. L., & Iftanti, E. (2024). A conceptual article: The teachers’ role in implementing cognitive reading strategies to enhance students’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE), 6(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v6i1.27136
Rusgandi, M. A. (2023). Reading Strategies in Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension: Are They Still Relevant?. Indonesia Journal of English Teaching (IJET), 12(1).
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on Research Methods: Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g
Suhud, A., & Puspita, Y. (2024). Kesulitan Membaca Permula Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Edusiana: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 119–206. https://doi.org/10.70437/edusiana.v2i1.587
Zebua, F. R. S., Harefa, T., Maru’ao, N., & Zega, R. (2025). An Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in the Reading Exercises of the Textbook “English for Nusantara” for the Eighth Grade of Junior High School Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(4), 1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i4.1025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ervinda Agesti, M. Ridho Kholid, Sri Suci Suryawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








