The Correlation of Students’ Vocabulary Mastery and Interest in Reading with their Writing Ability of Argumentation Text at The Eight Grade SMPN 14 Bandar Lampung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52217/ijlhe.v3i2.799Keywords:
writing arguments, vocabulary, interest in readingAbstract
This study aims to describe the correlation of students’ vocabulary mastery and reading interest with the argumentation writing ability of VIII grade SMPN 14 Bandar Lampung. This research was conducted because of the reality on the ground that the ability to write arguments and mastery of vocabulary, as well as reading interest need to be developed. The method used in this research is correlational method. The techniques used in collecting research data are questionnaires and tests. Testing the research hypothesis using the correlation coefficient test, product moment and multiple correlation. Previously, the analysis prerequisite test was conducted, namely the normality and linearity tests of the data. The results of the study can be concluded that, (1) there is a positive and significant correlation of vocabulary mastery and argumentation writing ability which is indicated by a correlation coefficient of 0.662 and a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.438 or 43.8%, (2) there is a positive and significant correlation between reading interest and argumentative writing ability, indicated by a correlation coefficient of 0.766 and a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.587 or 58.7%, (3) there is a positive and significant correlation between vocabulary mastery and reading interest with writing ability argumentation shown by the correlation coefficient of 0.804 and the coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.646 or 64.6%.
References
Daryanto. (2009). Panduan Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif. Jakarta : AV Publiser.
Gorys, Keraf. (2007). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta : PT.Gramedia.
Kosasih, E. (2002). Kompetensi Ketatabahasaan dan Kesusastraan Cermat Berbahasa Indonesia. Bandung :Yrama Widya.
Misra. (2013) Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Pengumuman Melalui Metode Latihan Siswa Kelas IV SD Inpres 2 Gio Kecamatan Moutong. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako Online Vol. 1 No. 2
Nababan. (2004). Analisis Pendidikan. Jakarta : Gramedia.
Parera, Daniel. (2004). Diksi dan Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia dan Sastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Poerwadarminta, WJS. (2003). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Reigeluth, Charles M. (Ed). (2000). Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. London: Routledge.
Reiguluth, C.M. (2000). Insrtucional Desaign Theories and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status. New Jersey : Lawrence.
Rozali, R., Fahrurrozi, F., Wahono, W., Angraini, N. ., & Windriani, D. . (2018). The Effort to Increase Vocabulary Mastery through The Use of Word Cards. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 1(1), 61–66.
Sari, M. ., Jaya, W. S. ., Supriyono, S., & Angraini, N. . (2019). The Correlation between Diction Mastery and Carefulness with Students’ Writing Ability. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 2(2), 17–24.
Soedjito. (2003). Kosa Kata Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta ;Gramedia.
Subing, E. S. ., Fahrurrozi, F., Sutrisno AB, J. ., Angraini, N. ., & Marcela, E. D. . (2019). Relationship of Student’s Vocabulary and Schematic Mastering with Observation Report Writing Skills. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 2(2), 1–8.
Suparno, Muh, Yunus. (2002). Keterampilan Dasar Menulis. Jakarta : UT.
Surastina, et al. (2018). Teknik Membaca. Yogyakarta: Elmatera Publishing.
Tarigan. (2002). Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung : Angkasa.
Wicaksono, Andri; dkk. (2015). Teori Pembelajaran Bahasa (Suatu Catatan Singkat). Yogyakarta: Garudhawaca.
Yuwono, A. ., Jaya, W. S. ., Hastuti, H., & Zulianti, H. . (2019). The Influence of Contextual Learning and Learning Activities towards The Students’ Ability in Writing Speech Texts on The Eight Grade of SMPN 25 Pesawaran. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 2(1), 13–22.
